Tag: Freedom in Jeopardy

Big Tech Censorship

“Remember when Nancy Pelosi she called the red hat – Make America Great Again – red hat the new ‘KKK’ hood.”

“Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez called President Trump a “white supremacist” countless times.”

“Ilhan Omar stated that the prior Trump rallies were ‘Klan rallies’.”

I agree with the twins, the above mentioned, would incite violence because specifically of the narrative that the progressives/liberals and people on the left keep repeating and repeating loudly. Why? Just because they do not like Trump.

And since progressives/liberals and people on the left constantly repeated the same narrative, various Trump supporters, minding their own business, wearing the apparel were attacked – for the simple fact that they are wearing the “Trump” gear.

I DO NOT like white supremacists, racists and people insinuating a false narratives.

At the 4:50 minute mark, the Hodgetwins did have a valid point… All the Congresswomen they mentioned earlier who made remarks still have their Twitter accounts. Why is that?

And they touched upon the BLM protesting / riots when they started destroying businesses, burning buildings and other businesses chanting, “NO JUSTICE, NO PEACE”. What does that mean to you? Why was that okay – to the left?

And remember BLM Chicago organizer, Ariel Atkins – the looting – in Chicago? “Looting… that is reparations… Anything they want to take, take it because these businesses have insurance…”

BLM is still on Twitter… still on FB. After all they’ve done.

All of this talk by government officials are talking in hyperbole (exaggerated statements).

The main point is that the current President of the United States no longer has his social media platforms. However, on the other hand – all these other government officials and protester organizers still do – even after all of the things THEY have stated in the past in year 2020 and before.

10:15 minute mark – Social media companies are a private company – they can do whatever they want… All right, then why can’t private companies be open for business during COVID-19? Doesn’t make any sense.

10:50 minute mark – Who gave all this power to the Big Tech companies? Congress did. Now that Big Tech has this “immunity” it is now being abused.

Section 230 was developed in response to a pair of lawsuits against Internet service providers (ISPs) in the early 1990s that had different interpretations of whether the service providers should be treated as publishers or distributors of content created by its users. After passage of the Telecommunications Act, the CDA was challenged in courts and ruled by the Supreme Court in Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union (1997) to be unconstitutional, though Section 230 was determined to be severable from the rest of the legislation and remained in place. Since then, several legal challenges have validated the constitutionality of Section 230.

In the following years, protections from Section 230 have come under more scrutiny on issues related to hate speech and ideological biases in relation to the power technology companies can hold on political discussions, and became a major issue during the 2020 United States presidential election.

Now – if you can’t see it – open your eyes WIDER. Congress has given power to all these people and look how corrupt they’ve become. Big Tech is hiding behind the “immunity”.

Big Tech can’t be sued so why are they censoring certain people?

If you can control the narrative in the public form, which these social media platforms are… You control literally everything. They want to control the narrative because hardly people watch T.V., listen to radio – but are largely on these social media platforms.

PBS lawyer seen on video calling for children of Republicans to be put in re-education camps.

I recently read from the Washington Examiner with embedded video, where the PBS lawyer specifically calls out and states in part, “…Even if Biden wins, we go for all Republican voters, and Homeland Security will take their children away. And we’ll put them (Trump supporters’ children) into re-education camps.”


At the 0:10 second mark in the YouTube Video
At the 0:14 second mark in the YouTube Video

Can someone please tell me, the truth, that this doesn’t sound like Communism? Because, to me, it is a spitting copy and progress DIRECTLY TOWARDS COMMUNISM.

I like how people randomly state, “Marxism does not lead to socialism and does not lead to Communism.” Or that “socialism does not lead to Communism.”

Those folks need to look at history again and look at the actual definition of Communism.

The actual definition of Communism is…A political theory derived from Karl Marx, advocating class war and leading to a society in which all property is publicly owned and each person works and is paid according to their abilities and needs. A doctrine based on revolutionary Marxian socialism and Marxism-Leninism that was the official ideology of the U.S.S.R.

Say again? So in actuality it is a political theory created by who? Karl Marx himself. The bottom line is… Marxism eventually leads to Socialism which then becomes Communism. It’s a political theory indeed. That looks and sounds very good and appealing! Bringing UTOPIA to all! It’s a complete lie.

As I said before in a few videos back then that shows the historical analyses of Communism. I don’t need to say more.

Re-education camps is not that far off in our world history.

It is still operating or ongoing in parts of China: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xinjiang_re-education_camps

It’s taken place in Vietnam: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Re-education_camp_(Vietnam)

And happened in Korea: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rights_in_North_Korea#Re-education_camps

Don’t forget various Gulag camps in Russian history as well: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulag

Yes, to people who may not be aware… Vietnam along with Cuba, North Korea and Laos are a Communist countries / Communist States.